Our readers keep the lights on and the coffee maker working hard! As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
Specs are compiled from manufacturer listings and verified buyer reviews and can change over time — please confirm the key details on the product page before buying.
You want women’s soccer shorts that stay put during a slide tackle, do not ride up on a long run, and actually have a pocket for your phone. The difference between a solid pair and a frustrating one usually depends on three things: the inseam length, the waistband grip, and whether the fabric wicks sweat instead of soaking it. This guide breaks down the best options across every budget and body type, so you know exactly which pair earns its spot in your gear bag.
I’m Mohammad — the founder and writer behind Calories Fit. This guide is built by comparing the manufacturers’ published specifications and the patterns across verified customer reviews, so you get each pick’s real strengths and trade-offs instead of marketing spin.
Here are the top-rated women’s soccer shorts for training, games, and everything in between.
Our Picks at a Glance
How To Choose The Best Women’s Soccer Shorts
The wrong pair of shorts can ruin a match — they bunch up at the waist, ride up on the thighs, or simply do not dry fast enough between halves. Here is what actually matters when you are shopping.
Inseam Length vs. Your Height
A shorter inseam (around 2.5″) gives you a bare-leg feel and more freedom for high kicks, but it can feel too revealing on shorter frames. A 5″ inseam offers more coverage and stays put better during repetitive motion like running or squatting. Your height and comfort level decide which side you land on.
Built-in Liner vs. No Liner
Some shorts come with a fitted inner short (a liner) for extra coverage and chafing protection, while others are a single layer you wear over compression tights or underwear. If you hate readjusting, a 2-in-1 style with a liner saves you that hassle.
Pocket Priority
Standard soccer shorts often skip pockets entirely to keep the silhouette clean. But if you use your phone for music, fitness tracking, or quick sideline communication, look for a zippered pocket that will not let your phone bounce out during a sprint. Side split pockets are common on running shorts but less secure for field sports.
Quick Comparison
| Model | Best For | Inseam | Pockets | Waist Rise | Amazon |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| MCEDAR Low Waisted 2.5″★ Best Overall | Retro fit, barely-there coverage | 2.5″ | 1 Zippered | Low | Amazon |
| G Gradual 5″Top Performer | All-day walking, zip security | 5″ | Front+Side+Zip | High | Amazon |
| Under Armour Challenger KnitClassic Pick | Basic soccer practice, no frills | ~6″ | None | Mid | Amazon |
| Adidas Tiro 23 | Classic soccer on-field shorts | Mid-thigh | None | Wide elastic | Amazon |
| PINSPARK 2 in 1 | Chafe-free running and training | Mid-rise | 1 Hidden (right) | Mid | Amazon |
| APWKL 2 in 1 Zipper | Tall frames, max pocket security | Comfort | 3 Zippered | Full elastic | Amazon |
| PUMA Team Liga | Budget uniform replacement | Standard | None | Elastic drawstring | Amazon |
| adidas Tiro 24 | Durable polyester for games | Mid-thigh | None | Drawcord elastic | Amazon |
| CE’ CERDR 2 in 1 5-Pack | Multi-pack value with 4 pockets | High-waist | 2 Zip + 2 Hidden | High elastic + drawstring | Amazon |
In‑Depth Reviews
1. MCEDAR Women’s Running Shorts Low Waisted 2.5″
Our pick — over 4.5★ from 450+ verified ratings; the strongest balance of quality and price.
You get the retro Lululemon look for a fraction of the cost, and it stays put.
Owners say they love the retro low-waist cut and the barely-there fabric that somehow keeps its shape even after deep squats and long strides. At just 2.5″ on the inseam (the distance from the crotch seam to the hem), the length leans short. Shorter frames (5’2″) report a perfect fit in medium, while taller builds (5’7″) still like the relaxed feel. The MCEDAR uses feather-light, moisture-wicking fabric (a material that pulls sweat off your skin) with a built-in mesh liner, plus a small zippered pocket holds a key or card securely without adding bulk. The drawstring is continuous, so you can cinch it down without the string pulling out mid-run.
What wins people over is the fit consistency — 50 buyers mention it as the strongest trait. The fabric stretches in all directions without feeling flimsy, and the low waist sits right on your hips for a look that rivals premium brands. The white color is see-through, so darker shades or a second layer are smarter for light-colored versions. Hot pink dye can vary slightly between batches, but that is a minor note in an otherwise glowingly reviewed short.
The 2.5″ inseam is nearly half the length of the 5″ G Gradual shorts below, so the choice is clear: go MCEDAR for a bare-leg, retro vibe, or choose the G Gradual for more thigh coverage.
Why It Wins
- Ultra-stretchy, lightweight fabric with tight inner mesh
- Low-rise 2.5″ cut sits perfectly on hips
- Consistent sizing across multiple colors, say reviewers
- Small zippered pocket for essentials
The Honest Trade-Off
- White color is see-through, so you need dark compression underneath
- Very short inseam may not suit everyone
- Hot pink shade varies slightly between batches (a minor note)
Your Field Short: Choose this for the lightweight, low-rise feel that fits most body types — especially if you are 5’2″ to 5’7″ and prefer a 2.5″ inseam.
Think Twice If: You need longer coverage or a non-see-through white option — the 5″ G Gradual gives you more fabric and a high waist instead.
2. G Gradual Women’s 5″ Athletic Running Shorts with Zip Pockets
Deep zippered pockets hold your phone securely during five-mile walks or theme park days.
These are the shorts buyers reach for when they plan to be on their feet for hours and need a secure phone pocket. The 19% spandex (a stretchy synthetic fiber) fabric stretches generously, and the high-waist cut with a tied drawstring stays in place even after hours of movement. Buyers report the 5″ inseam feels longer than expected — some measure it closer to 7″ — which gives you thigh coverage that the 2.5″ MCEDAR shorts cannot match. The petal-cut sides add a stylish detail without sacrificing range of motion.
The front and side zippered pockets earn strong praise from buyers who need to carry a phone and keys without the bounce. Comfort and fit each get 49 positive mentions, making this a rare tie between two categories. The catch: the waistband runs about an inch larger than similar shorts, so sizing down is a common move. For short torsos (around 5’2″), the high waist can hit unusually high under the bustline unless you pull it into position. There is no built-in liner, so you will need your own compression shorts or underwear underneath.
At 5″ it is exactly double the inseam of the MCEDAR 2.5″, making it better for anyone who wants coverage without sacrificing pocket security.
Who It Works Best For: Walkers, hikers, and anyone who hates carrying a bag — the deep zippered pockets hold a phone and keys with no bounce. The high waist is forgiving for longer torsos.
The One Catch: The waist runs large, so size down unless you prefer a loose fit. No built-in liner means you must plan your base layer.
3. Under Armour Womens UA Challenger Knit Shorts
A no-fuss, no-pocket soccer short that fits like a classic uniform piece.
If you want the traditional soccer silhouette — mid-thigh length, lightweight knit, zero pocket bulk — this is your short. Buyers call it the new favorite for soccer practice, noting the breathable material that lets you “stay fresher under pressure” and a fit that hits nicely at mid-thigh. One buyer at 5’2″, 147 lbs, reports size medium fits perfectly. The fabric is very breathable and washes well without losing shape. It runs basic — no frills, no zippers, no inner liner — which is exactly what some players want.
The fabric is thin enough to be comfortable but not squat-proof; a few owners note you need compression shorts underneath for heavier workouts. There are zero pockets, which multiple reviews mention as the biggest letdown. For pure on-field performance where you never carry anything, this simplicity is a strength.
Compared to the PUMA Team Liga below, both are pocketless uniform shorts, but the Under Armour has a slightly lighter knit feel while the PUMA runs snugger in the waist for curvier players.
Your Uniform Pick: Reach for these when you need a basic training short that breathes well and fits consistently. No pockets means nothing to dig into during a slide.
Look Elsewhere If: You need a pocket for your phone or you want thicker fabric that is squat-proof — the G Gradual or APWKL have you covered.
4. Adidas Womens Tiro 23 Shorts
The closest you will get to the old Nike Park II fit in a modern soccer short.
These are purpose-built for the field, with AEROREADY (adidas’s moisture-wicking technology that pulls sweat away from your skin) to keep you dry during intense moments, plus a wide elastic waistband for extra support. One buyer at 5’7″, 142 lbs, says size small fits perfectly, and the length is just right — not too short, not overly long. The fabric is thin but breathable and not see-through, which separates it from some other lightweight options. It is best for cool-weather soccer but versatile enough for gym workouts and hikes.
The only downside is the same as the Under Armour above: no pockets. Owners repeatedly mention the missing pockets, but agree the comfort and length make it worth it. The wide waistband offers a secure feel that does not dig in.
The Tiro 23 is similar to the Tiro 24 below, but the Tiro 23 has a wider waistband and slightly softer fabric, while the Tiro 24 uses a more durable polyester build.
Field-Ready Verdict: Choose these for on-field performance, especially if you loved the Nike Park II fit. The wide waistband and breathable AEROREADY fabric are the standouts.
Skip If: Pockets are a dealbreaker — even a single zippered pocket is missing here, so the G Gradual or CE’ CERDR is better.
5. PINSPARK Women’s 2 in 1 Running Shorts with Liner Pockets
The liner prevents chafing, so you never need to readjust during a workout.
If you hate the friction that comes with loose shorts, the built-in liner on this PINSPARK pair is a standout. The inner layer gives gentle compression and prevents chafing, while the outer layer is lightweight and quick-drying. A right-side hidden pocket fits a phone, though some buyers find it a bit shallow for easy access during a workout. The mid-rise waist is comfortable but runs small — most reviewers recommend sizing up, especially if you have curves (one at 5’4″, 158 lbs, says size L was snug, so XL was better). Buyers describe the fabric as soft, stretchy, and comfortable, and note it does not slip or ride up during runs or gym sessions.
A recurring note: the size runs small, and the pocket can be difficult to use on the go. A small number of buyers received a different style than pictured, so check the packaging when it arrives. The red color is much brighter than the listing photos.
Compared to the APWKL 2-in-1 below, the PINSPARK has one hidden pocket versus the APWKL’s three zippered pockets, and the APWKL is better suited for taller frames.
Why It Wins on Value
- Built-in compression liner prevents chafing entirely
- Quick-dry fabric works great in heat and humidity
- Hidden right-side pocket fits a phone
- Mid-rise cut is flattering and stays put
The Honest Trade-Off
- Size runs small — definitely size up, especially around the waist
- Pocket is a bit shallow for easy phone access during activity
- Occasional inconsistent quality between color lots
Best for the Budget-Minded Athlete: Grab these if you want the chafe-free comfort of a 2-in-1 without spending premium money. Size up for the right fit.
Skip If: You need a secure zippered pocket for your phone — the APWKL below gives you three zippered pockets for slightly more.
6. APWKL Women’s 2 in 1 Running Shorts Athletic Workout Gym Zipper Pockets
You get three zippered pockets on a 2-in-1 short that tall athletes praise for the fit.
The APWKL stands out for its pocket count — a deep side pocket, a back zippered pocket, and a liner pocket give you three secure storage options. Taller buyers (one at 6’2″, 175 lbs, says size XL fits well) particularly appreciate that. The built-in mesh liner provides full hip coverage so you can squat, lunge, and bike without worrying about exposure. The fabric is quick-drying with 4-way stretch (it stretches in four directions for full mobility), and the elastic waistband has an external drawstring for extra cinching. Owners mention zero see-through issues, even in lighter colors, and the liner does not chafe or ride up like cheaper versions.
The aspect most buyers praise is the fit — 133 call it the best part — followed closely by comfort at 85 mentions. The only consistent complaint is the back zippered pocket: some find it more annoying than useful because of the location. Sizing can be slightly inconsistent between colors, and the hot pink variant comes with a light blue liner instead of a matching pink one — a minor visual mismatch. Some pairs arrive with stubborn wrinkles that do not iron out easily.
Compared to the PINSPARK, the APWKL gives you three times the pocket count and a better fit for taller frames, but it costs a bit more and has occasional fit variation between colors.
For the Security-Minded Athlete: If you need to carry a phone, keys, and a card securely during a run or gym session, the three zippered pockets here are class-leading in this lineup. Taller frames get the best fit.
Watch Out For: The back zippered pocket location is hit-or-miss, and the hot pink color has a mismatched liner. Size up if you are between sizes.
7. PUMA Womens Team Liga Shorts
A tried-and-true soccer short that costs less than the club shop’s version.
For players who need a clean, breathable short for games or practice without spending extra, the PUMA Team Liga is the reliable choice. The fabric is thin but not see-through in darker colors, and the elastic waistband with drawstring gives a secure fit that stays put during sprints and slides. Buyers on the curvier side report the length is generous enough to move freely without being overly snug. One buyer who wears a size 29 jeans says a medium is snug but wearable (sizing up gives a more traditional soccer length). The fit is close and athletic, which is ideal for on-field performance.
Comfort, fit, and quality each get an equal share of mentions (7 mentions each), which tells you this is a consistent short that does one thing well. The biggest missing piece is the lack of pockets — several customers note that finding pockets in women’s shorts is rare, and this is no exception. The deep red color is vibrant and holds up well.
Compared to the Under Armour Challenger, the PUMA runs a bit snugger in the waist, so taller or curvier players may prefer the Under Armour’s looser cut.
Game-Day Value: Pick this up if you need a simple, breathable short for the pitch and do not want to pay uniform-store prices. The red color is a crowd favorite.
Pass On It If: You need pockets or a built-in liner — the APWKL or G Gradual are better for your daily carry needs.
8. adidas Women’s Tiro 24 Shorts
The durable polyester build survives game after game without pilling.
The Tiro 24 is the evolution of the Tiro line, swapping softer knits for a more durable polyester (a synthetic fabric) shell that holds up to repeated washing and intense matches. AEROREADY keeps you dry during high-intensity moments, and the drawcord on the elastic waist lets you dial in the fit exactly how you like it. One buyer reports size Large fits a 35″ waist and 42″ hips comfortably. The length is described as shorter than basketball shorts but generous enough for full coverage. The fabric feels soft and cool to the touch, which is great in hot weather.
Quality is the most-mentioned positive at 12 mentions, followed by fit at 9. Owners love how well these hold up after washes — no seam issues, no fading. The thin material is breathable but slightly see-through in lighter colors, so you will want dark compression underneath. There are no pockets, consistent with the traditional soccer look. The side stitching makes some feel like they are wearing them backward, a visual quirk rather than a functional problem.
The Tiro 24 is slightly more durable and rugged than the Tiro 23, but the Tiro 23 has a wider, softer waistband that some prefer for comfort.
Built to Last: Grab these if you want a short that survives frequent washing and tough matches. The polyester construction is more rugged than the Tiro 23’s softer knit.
The One Annoyance: No pockets, and the side stitching may visually bother you. If you want the same durability with pockets, go with the G Gradual above.
9. CE’ CERDR Womens 2 in 1 Running Shorts High Waisted | 5 Pack
Five shorts with four pockets each — the ultimate wardrobe refresh in one box.
If you are tired of doing laundry mid-week just to have clean shorts for every workout, this five-pack solves the problem. Each short comes with a high-waisted elastic waistband with drawstring, a built-in soft compression liner, and four pockets — two zippered outer pockets and two hidden inner pockets. One buyer at 5’6″, 141 lbs, reports size medium fits perfectly. The biker-short inner layer is snug but not restrictive, providing anti-chafe protection that owners with thigh sensitivity praise. The outer shell is lightweight polyester while the inner is soft, stretchy spandex (a stretchy synthetic fiber). The side-split design allows full range of motion for squats, lunges, and sprints.
Fit is the most-discussed aspect at 82 mentions, with comfort right behind at 55. The pockets are deep enough to hold an iPhone and keys without digging into your leg, and the zipper closure gives you confidence during high-movement activities. The catch: some buyers find the outer short has too much extra fabric compared to the fitted inner, creating a slightly unflattering silhouette for certain body types. The shorts also arrive tightly packed and wrinkled, but a quick wash resolves that. The white color is opaque, which is a win over many competitors.
This pack gives you the best per-short value in the lineup. The only close competitor on pocket count is the APWKL with three zippered pockets, but APWKL is a single pair, not a five-pack.
The Multi-Pack Advantage
- Five shorts with four pockets each (2 zippered, 2 hidden)
- Soft compression liner prevents chafing completely
- High waist with drawstring stays put during any movement
- Great value per short compared to buying singles
The Honest Trade-Off
- Outer short fabric can look baggy compared to the fitted inner liner
- Arrives wrinkled from tight packaging
- Size up if you are curvy or between sizes for the best fit
For the Wardrobe Refresh: Buy this if you want to replace all your old shorts at once and never think about laundry again. The pocket layout and chafe-free liner are the standout features.
Skip If: You prefer a slim, single-layer silhouette — the MCEDAR or G Gradual give you a more streamlined look per pair.
Understanding the Specs
Inseam Length
This is the distance from the crotch seam to the hem. A shorter inseam (2.5″) gives you a bare-leg look and maximum freedom for high kicks, but it can feel too revealing. A longer inseam (5″ or 6″) provides more coverage and stays put during running or squatting. Your height decides the right feel: shorter frames often prefer 2.5″, while taller frames lean toward 5″ or more.
Built-in Liner vs. No Liner
Shorts with a built-in liner (called 2-in-1 shorts) have a fitted inner short that prevents chafing and exposure during movement. Shorts without a liner are lighter and more breathable but require you to wear your own compression layer underneath. If you hate readjusting during a game or run, a 2-in-1 style is usually the better bet.
FAQ
What is the best inseam length for soccer shorts?
Do I need a built-in liner in my soccer shorts?
Why do some soccer shorts not have pockets?
Will a 2.5″ inseam short be too short for me?
How do I choose between high-waist and low-waist shorts?
Are white soccer shorts see-through?
What is AEROREADY and why does it matter?
How should women’s soccer shorts fit around the waist?
Final Thoughts: The Verdict
For the majority of shoppers, the women’s soccer shorts winner is the MCEDAR Low Waisted 2.5″ because it nails the retro Lululemon dupe fit at a budget-friendly price and consistently impresses across hundreds of buyers. If you want deeper pockets and a longer inseam for walking or training, grab the G Gradual 5″. And for the ultimate wardrobe refresh with built-in liners and multiple pockets, the CE’ CERDR 5-pack is the one to reach for.
How We Picked
We do not accept paid placement. Every pick is matched to a real buyer and a real use-case; we do not hands-on test units.
Sources & Methodology
Specifications: manufacturer listings and product documentation. Review insights: verified customer reviews, as of July 2026. Pricing: not shown on this page (it changes often); check the current price via the retailer link.
As an Amazon Associate, Calories Fit earns from qualifying purchases. This does not affect which products we feature.